QDNA Send a message

Open weight models for local deployment 2026: complete comparison

The 2026 comparison of open-weight models for local deployment on DGX Spark, 2× Spark cluster and DGX Station GB300: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and V4 Pro, Kimi K3, GLM 5.3, Kimi K2.7 Code, MiniMax M3, Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B, Qwen3.8-27B, Llama 3.1 70B. Total and active parameters, context, published weights, licence and hardware, every value re-read in the model's Hugging Face repository.

Open model blocks of different sizes beside a compact computer, a workstation and a server.
Conceptual illustration of choosing a model that fits local hardware.

Updated on 8 October 2026: reference prices raised to €7,000 excl. VAT for the DGX Spark and €150,000 excl. VAT for the DGX Station GB300 after the observed increase; 3-year costs and cost per million tokens recomputed, the LDLC.pro and pi3g readings remain cited.

Updated on 26 September 2026: GLM 5.3 (756 GB FP8 weights, GLM-5.3 licence, official 464 GB NVFP4 conversion since 14 September) replaces GLM 5.2 in the tables; DGX Spark price from LDLC.pro (€5,083 before VAT), pi3g page of 14 September, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 revision noted, Claude Opus 5.5 as the closed reference.

Updated on September 2, 2026: 3-year cost table recomputed with a visible formula (hardware at a dated retailer price plus electricity at the regulated tariff); the August 2 amounts "~€12,000 / ~€25,000 / ~€200,000", which mixed acquisition and services without detail, are removed; the DGX Station is costed at €95,000 excl. VAT (pi3g reading of August 27, 2026) since NVIDIA publishes no price; monthly-revenue condition added to the Qwen3.8-Max licence; every value in the model table re-read in the Hugging Face repositories.

Updated on September 1, 2026: model table corrected against the Hugging Face repositories. The August 2 version compared a model that does not exist ("Qwen 3.7") and gave wrong active parameters, context windows and licences for Kimi K3, GLM 5.2, Kimi K2.7 Code, MiniMax M3 and Llama 3.1 70B. The score and API-price columns, which had no dated source, are removed.

Short answer. Of the nine open-weight models re-read against their Hugging Face repositories on September 1, 2026, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (284 billion parameters, 13 billion active, 1,048,576-token context, 167 GB of published weights, MIT licence) is the only frontier-class model whose published weights fit as-is on a DGX Station GB300 and, quantised, on a cluster of two DGX Spark. GLM 5.3 (744 billion, 40 active, 1,048,576 tokens, MIT) and Kimi K2.7 Code (1,000 billion, 32 active, 262,144 tokens, modified MIT) fit on a DGX Station at 4 bits. Kimi K3 (2,800 billion, 104 active), DeepSeek V4 Pro (1,600 billion, 49 active) and Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B (2,400 billion, 95 active) exceed every single-node machine in the catalogue. For a workstation or a single card, Qwen3.8-27B (27 billion, dense, Apache 2.0).

Methodology

This comparison evaluates open-weight models for local deployment on enterprise hardware (DGX Spark 128 GB, 2× Spark cluster 256 GB, DGX Station GB300 748 GB).

The criteria are: total and active parameters (as stated by the vendor on the model card), native context (the max_position_embeddings value in config.json), published weights (the sum of the repository's safetensors files, in the format the vendor ships), licence (the repository's LICENSE file) and hardware (does the model fit in memory, with published weights as-is or requantised to 4 bits).

Every value was re-read on September 1, 2026 in the config.json, README and licence of each model's Hugging Face repository, and checked against the site's fact base (connaissance/faits.yaml). Third-party indices such as the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index are not shown as a column: on the consultation date (v4.1.1, September 1, 2026) the index did not cover every model in the table, and vendor-published scores cannot be compared across vendors. API prices are not shown either: they change without notice and are read on each vendor's price list.

Open weight models comparison for local deployment

Reading: "total parameters" and "active" are the figures the vendor states on the model card; the Hugging Face counter, which counts tensor elements, differs by a few percent (753 billion for GLM 5.3, 291 for DeepSeek V4 Flash).

ModelTotal parametersActive per tokenNative context (tokens)Published weightsLicenceSource
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731284 billion13 billion1,048,576167 GB (FP4 + FP8)MITdeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
DeepSeek V4 Pro1,600 billion49 billion1,048,576865 GB (FP4 + FP8)MITdeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro
Kimi K32,800 billion104 billion1,048,5761,561 GB (MXFP4)Kimi K3 Licensemoonshotai/Kimi-K3
GLM 5.3744 billion40 billion1,048,576756 GB (FP8)GLM-5.3zai-org/GLM-5.3
Kimi K2.7 Code1,000 billion32 billion262,144595 GB (compressed-tensors)Modified MITmoonshotai/Kimi-K2.7-Code
MiniMax M3428 billion ("about", per the vendor)23 billion ("about")1,048,576854 GB (BF16)MiniMax CommunityMiniMaxAI/MiniMax-M3
Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B2,400 billion95 billion262,144 (extensible to 1,010,000 per the model card)4,892 GB (BF16)Qwen3.8-MaxQwen/Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B
Qwen3.8-27B27 billion (dense)27 billion262,14456 GB (BF16)Apache 2.0Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct70 billion (dense)70 billion131,072 ("128k" on Meta's model card)141 GB (BF16)Llama 3.1 Communitymeta-llama/Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct

Native context is the max_position_embeddings value in config.json; DeepSeek, Kimi K2.7 Code and Qwen add a YaRN extension that the model card announces separately. Published weights are the sum of the repository's safetensors files: a model shipped in BF16 (MiniMax M3, Qwen, Llama) weighs two bytes per parameter, a model shipped in FP8 (GLM 5.3) one byte, a model shipped in FP4 or MXFP4 (DeepSeek, Kimi K3) about half a byte, which is why Kimi K3 (2,800 billion) weighs barely more than twice GLM 5.3 (744 billion). On dense models (Qwen3.8-27B, Llama 3.1 70B), every parameter is active on every token.

Open weight models comparison by hardware

A model fits on a machine if its weights fit in memory with room left for the KV cache. The "at 4 bits" column applies the formula used by the site's sizing pages: total parameters × 0.5 byte, plus a 15% execution margin.

It is compared with the usable memory of each machine: 128 GB (DGX Spark), 256 GB (2× Spark cluster), 748 GB (DGX Station GB300). A "No" means the model exceeds memory even requantised to 4 bits; it says nothing about more aggressive quantisations.

Schematic table placing nine open-weight models on three machines, DGX Spark 128 GB, 2× Spark cluster 256 GB and DGX Station GB300 748 GB, with the calculated weight at 4 bits. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731, 163 GB: 3-bit GGUF on Spark, fits on the cluster, as-is on the Station. DeepSeek V4 Pro, 920 GB, Kimi K3, 1,610 GB, and Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B, 1,380 GB: fit on no machine. GLM 5.3, 428 GB: Station at 4 bits only. Kimi K2.7 Code, 575 GB: Station, published weights as-is. MiniMax M3, 246 GB: cluster at 4 bits with 10 GB of headroom, Station at 4 bits. Qwen3.8-27B, 15.5 GB: as-is on Spark, fits everywhere. Llama 3.1 70B, 40 GB: Spark at 4 bits, cluster as-is, fits on the Station. Formula: total parameters × 0.5 byte plus a 15% margin.
Each row places a model on the three machines, from published weights as-is down to "does not fit". Only the DGX Station GB300 hosts three frontier-class models, and three models fit on none.
ModelWeights at 4 bits (calculated)DGX Spark 128 GB2× Spark cluster 256 GBDGX Station GB300 748 GB
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731163 GBNo at 4 bits; yes as a 3-bit Unsloth GGUF (104 GB), see the DGX guideYesYes, published weights as-is (167 GB)
DeepSeek V4 Pro920 GBNoNoNo (920 GB > 748 GB)
Kimi K31,610 GBNoNoNo (1,561 GB published > 748 GB)
GLM 5.3428 GBNoNoYes at 4 bits
Kimi K2.7 Code575 GBNoNoYes, published weights as-is (595 GB)
MiniMax M3246 GBNoYes at 4 bits, only 10 GB of headroomYes at 4 bits
Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B1,380 GBNoNoNo (1,380 GB > 748 GB)
Qwen3.8-27B15.5 GBYes, published weights as-is (56 GB)YesYes
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct40 GBYes at 4 bitsYes, published weights as-is (141 GB)Yes

Reading: three frontier-class models fit on a DGX Station GB300: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 without requantising, GLM 5.3 and Kimi K2.7 Code at 4 bits. On a cluster of two DGX Spark, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 remains the only model of that class that fits with reasonable headroom for the KV cache; the detail per quantisation (concurrent users by context length) is in our DeepSeek V4 Flash guide for DGX Station and 2× Spark cluster. Kimi K3, DeepSeek V4 Pro and Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B need a multi-GPU machine with more than 900 GB of memory, which puts them outside a single-node deployment.

Open weight models comparison by use case

Reading: for local deployment on a DGX Station GB300, the default choice is DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (167 GB published, 1,048,576-token context, cost per million tokens [TO BE MEASURED] on that machine for lack of a published throughput; €9.4/M in the median assumption on a DGX Spark according to our calculation).

Use caseRecommended modelJustification
Coding agents, software engineeringDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Scores published by DeepSeek on the model card: Terminal Bench 2.1 82.7%, NL2Repo 54.2%, DeepSWE 54.4%, Toolathlon-Verified 70.3%. Context 1,048,576, 167 GB published.
General-purpose chat on-premisesDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or GLM 5.3Both fit on a DGX Station GB300 with a one-million-token context; GLM 5.3 needs a 4-bit conversion (756 GB published in FP8; official nvidia/GLM-5.3-NVFP4 conversion, 464 GB, since 14 September 2026).
Specialised coding assistantKimi K2.7 Code1,000 billion parameters, 32 active, 262,144-token context, 595 GB published that fit as-is on a DGX Station.
General reasoning, precisionClaude Opus 5.5 (closed API)Knowledge and reasoning exams remain the ground of proprietary models; their vendors do not publish scores on the same benchmarks as open models, so we do not compare them.
Compact model (small business, workstation)Qwen3.8-27B27 billion dense parameters, 56 GB in BF16, 15.5 GB at 4 bits, 262,144-token context, Apache 2.0. See Qwen3.8-27B on-premises.
Fine-tuning on domain dataDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Open weights under MIT; fine-tuning recipe documented by Unsloth.
Sensitive data, GDPR, HDS, SecNumCloudDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 on-premisesOpen weights, on-site execution, no data transfer, no vendor rate limit or withdrawal.
Tight budget, low volumeDeepSeek API V4 Flash 0731No hardware investment; price to be read on the DeepSeek price list, which distinguishes peak and off-peak hours.
Largest open modelKimi K32,800 billion parameters, 104 active, 1,048,576-token context, native vision; 1,561 GB published, out of reach of a single-node machine. See the Kimi K3 page.

For a DGX Spark 128 GB, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 as a 3-bit GGUF (104 GB) or Qwen3.8-27B without requantising. For API use without hardware, DeepSeek API V4 Flash 0731.

How do open weight models compare by 3-year total cost of ownership (TCO)?

The amounts below are limited to what can be computed from public sources: hardware at the reference price, for the PNY DGX Spark €7,000 excl. VAT, the price used from October 2026 after the observed increase (LDLC.pro reading of 26 September 2026: €5,083 excl. VAT).

Electricity is counted over three years at the rated power of the NVIDIA sheet, an upper-bound assumption (240 W × 8,760 h × 3 = 6,307 kWh; ServeTheHome measures 60 to 200 W under load) at EDF's regulated Tarif Bleu for professionals, Base option, grid of August 1, 2026 (€0.1624/kWh excl. VAT, CRE deliberation 2026-147), hence 7,000 + 1,024 ≈ €8,000 excl. VAT for one Spark and twice that, €16,000 excl. VAT, for two.

For the DGX Station, €150,000 excl. VAT, the price used from October 2026 after the observed increase (Exxact Valence configuration at pi3g, page dated September 14, 2026: €95,000 excl. VAT; €88,000 to €110,500 excl. VAT depending on the OEM), plus 1,600 W × 8,760 h × 3 = 42,048 kWh, i.e. ≈ €156,800 excl. VAT. Integration, operations and training are quoted separately and are not included. These amounts depend on the machine, not on the model.

A "Does not fit" cell refers to the hardware table above. The cost per million tokens is only calculated for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731, the only model with a third-party throughput published with its conditions on a DGX Spark; on a DGX Station no throughput is published: [TO BE MEASURED]. For the others it is not calculated.

ModelDGX Spark 128 GB (hardware + electricity, 3 years, excl. VAT)2× Spark cluster 256 GB (hardware + electricity, 3 years, excl. VAT)DGX Station GB300 748 GB (3 years)Cost per million tokens
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731≈ €8,000 excl. VAT (3-bit GGUF)≈ €16,000 excl. VAT≈ €156,800 excl. VAT€9.4/M on a DGX Spark in the median assumption (30 tokens/s, 30% load), €2.4 to €42/M depending on throughput and load; [TO BE MEASURED] on a DGX Station (calculation and sources)
DeepSeek V4 ProDoes not fitDoes not fitDoes not fitNot calculated
Kimi K3Does not fitDoes not fitDoes not fitNot calculated
GLM 5.3Does not fitDoes not fit≈ €156,800 excl. VAT (4 bits)Not calculated
Kimi K2.7 CodeDoes not fitDoes not fit≈ €156,800 excl. VATNot calculated
MiniMax M3Does not fit≈ €16,000 excl. VAT (4 bits, little headroom)≈ €156,800 excl. VAT (4 bits)Not calculated
Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95BDoes not fitDoes not fitDoes not fitNot calculated
Qwen3.8-27B≈ €8,000 excl. VAT≈ €16,000 excl. VAT≈ €156,800 excl. VATNot calculated
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct≈ €8,000 excl. VAT (4 bits)≈ €16,000 excl. VAT≈ €156,800 excl. VATNot calculated

Reading: the cheapest machine that serves a frontier-class model is the cluster of two DGX Spark with DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731. The DGX Station GB300 adds GLM 5.3 and Kimi K2.7 Code. A single DGX Spark is limited to DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 requantised to 3 bits, to Qwen3.8-27B and to Llama 3.1 70B at 4 bits.

Open weight models comparison by licence and sovereignty

The conditions below were read in each repository's LICENSE file on September 1, 2026. A licence with conditions does not rule out an enterprise deployment; it imposes an attribution, a threshold or a prior agreement that you need to know before signing.

ModelLicenceSpecific conditionsLocal execution (DGX Station 748 GB)
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731MITNoneYes
DeepSeek V4 ProMITNoneNo (920 GB at 4 bits)
Kimi K3Kimi K3 LicenseSeparate agreement with Moonshot AI for a model-as-a-service operator whose revenue exceeds $20M over twelve months; "Kimi K3" attribution above 100 million monthly active users or $20M monthly revenue.No (1,561 GB published)
GLM 5.3GLM-5.3Z.ai's own licence, to be re-read in the repository; GLM 5.2, same base, remains published under MITYes at 4 bits
Kimi K2.7 CodeModified MIT"Kimi K2.7 Code" attribution above 100 million monthly active users or $20M monthly revenue.Yes
MiniMax M3MiniMax CommunityNon-commercial use free; commercial use requires the "Built with MiniMax M3" attribution, a notice to MiniMax, and written authorisation above $20M yearly revenue.Yes at 4 bits
Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95BQwen3.8-MaxAttribution above 100 million monthly active users or $20M in monthly revenue; separate agreement for a model-as-a-service or AI-assistant operator whose revenue exceeds $50M over twelve months.No (1,380 GB at 4 bits)
Qwen3.8-27BApache 2.0NoneYes
Llama 3.1 70B InstructLlama 3.1 Community"Built with Llama" attribution and a copy of the licence on redistribution; specific licence to request from Meta above 700 million monthly active users.Yes

Reading: for sovereignty and GDPR, HDS or SecNumCloud compliance, the permissively licensed, unconditional models that fit on a DGX Station are DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (MIT) and Qwen3.8-27B (Apache 2.0); GLM 5.3 fits at 4 bits under Z.ai's GLM-5.3 licence, and GLM 5.2, the same base published under MIT, remains available. The Kimi, MiniMax and Llama licences remain compatible with an internal enterprise deployment, whose 100 or 700 million user thresholds are not reached, but they must be re-read before any commercial use.

Conclusion: which open weight model for which use case

The conclusion matches each use case with the open weight model that fits the target hardware: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 for code and sensitive data, GLM 5.3 for long context, Kimi K2.7 Code for the specialised assistant.

Use caseRecommended modelJustification
Coding agents, software engineeringDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Terminal Bench 2.1 82.7%, NL2Repo 54.2%, DeepSWE 54.4% (scores published by DeepSeek), 1,048,576-token context, fits on DGX Station and 2× Spark cluster.
General reasoning, precisionClaude Opus 5.5 (closed API)Ground of proprietary models; no scores published on the same benchmarks, so no numeric comparison.
Sensitive data, GDPR, HDS, SecNumCloudDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 on-premisesUnconditional MIT, on-site execution, no data transfer.
General-purpose chat with a one-million-token contextGLM 5.3 or DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Both fit on a DGX Station GB300; GLM 5.3 at 4 bits, DeepSeek as-is.
Specialised coding assistantKimi K2.7 Code595 GB published that fit as-is on a DGX Station, 262,144-token context, modified MIT.
Tight budget, low volumeDeepSeek API V4 Flash 0731No investment or maintenance; price on the vendor's list.
Largest open modelKimi K32,800 billion, 104 active, 1,048,576 tokens, native vision; 1,561 GB published, multi-GPU required.
Compact model (small business, workstation)Qwen3.8-27B27 billion dense, 56 GB in BF16, 15.5 GB at 4 bits, Apache 2.0, fits on a DGX Spark or a single card.

References

Frequently asked questions

What is the best open weight model for local deployment in 2026?

For a single-node deployment, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: 284 billion parameters of which 13 active, a 1,048,576-token context, 167 GB of weights published in FP4 and FP8, MIT licence. It is the only frontier-class model whose published weights fit as-is on a DGX Station GB300 and, quantised, on a cluster of two DGX Spark. On the agentic benchmarks DeepSeek publishes (Terminal Bench 2.1 82.7%, NL2Repo 54.2%), it leads the same vendor's Pro version.

What is the difference between DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and V4 Pro?

V4 Flash 0731 totals 284 billion parameters of which 13 active per token; V4 Pro totals 1,600 of which 49 active. Both have a native context of 1,048,576 tokens and an MIT licence. Published weights are 167 GB for Flash and 865 GB for Pro: Flash fits on a DGX Station GB300, Pro does not. On the agentic benchmarks published by DeepSeek (Terminal Bench 2.1, NL2Repo, DeepSWE, Toolathlon), Flash 0731 leads the April Pro preview; the Pro 0813 revision of 13 August 2026 has since published 87.9 on Terminal Bench 2.1 (Z.ai harness).

Which open weight model fits on a DGX Spark 128 GB?

Without requantising, Qwen3.8-27B (56 GB in BF16). At 4 bits, Llama 3.1 70B (about 40 GB, calculated as 70 billion × 0.5 byte plus a 15% margin). DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 only fits as a 3-bit GGUF (104 GB, Unsloth build), leaving 24 GB for the KV cache. GLM 5.3, Kimi K2.7 Code, MiniMax M3, Kimi K3, DeepSeek V4 Pro and Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B exceed 128 GB even at 4 bits.

Which open weight model fits on a DGX Station GB300?

With 748 GB of usable memory: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (167 GB published) and Kimi K2.7 Code (595 GB published) as-is; GLM 5.3 (428 GB at 4 bits) and MiniMax M3 (246 GB at 4 bits) after requantising; Qwen3.8-27B and Llama 3.1 70B easily. Kimi K3 (1,561 GB published), DeepSeek V4 Pro (920 GB at 4 bits) and Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B (1,380 GB at 4 bits) do not fit.

Why does the table give neither scores nor API prices?

Vendor-published scores are measured under conditions that differ from one vendor to the next and cannot be compared; the independent Artificial Analysis index did not cover every model in the table on the consultation date (September 1, 2026). API prices change without notice and are read on each vendor's price list. We prefer a missing column to an unverifiable value.